CHAPTER 9 SOLUTIONS
EXERCISE 9-2 -VIP
|
|
|
|
Net
Realizable Value Less Normal Profit (Floor) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
$90* |
|
$70** |
|
$120 |
|
$90 |
|
$75 |
|
$75 |
E |
|
80 |
|
60 |
|
72 |
|
72 |
|
80 |
|
72 |
F |
|
65 |
|
45 |
|
70 |
|
65 |
|
80 |
|
65 |
G |
|
65 |
|
45 |
|
30 |
|
45 |
|
80 |
|
45 |
H |
|
80 |
|
60 |
|
70 |
|
70 |
|
50 |
|
50 |
I |
|
60 |
|
40 |
|
30 |
|
40 |
|
36 |
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Estimated
selling price—Estimated selling expense = $120 – $30 = $90.
**$90 – $20 =
$70.
EXERCISE 9-5
(a) |
February |
|
March |
|
April |
Sales |
$29,000 |
|
$35,000 |
|
$40,000 |
Cost of
goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, beginning |
15,000 |
|
15,100 |
|
17,000 |
Purchases |
20,000 |
|
24,000 |
|
26,500 |
Cost of goods available |
35,000 |
|
39,100 |
|
43,500 |
Inventory, ending |
15,100 |
|
17,000 |
|
13,000 |
Cost of goods sold |
19,900 |
|
22,100 |
|
30,500 |
Gross profit |
9,100 |
|
12,900 |
|
9,500 |
Gain (loss)
due to market |
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations of inventory* |
(2,000) |
|
1,100 |
|
700 |
|
$ 7,100 |
|
$14,000 |
|
$10,200 |
* |
Jan.
31 |
|
Feb.
28 |
|
Mar.
31 |
|
Apr.
30 |
Inventory at cost |
$15,000 |
|
$15,100 |
|
$17,000 |
|
$13,000 |
Inventory at the lower of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance amount needed to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) due to market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**$500 –
$2,500 = $(2,000)
$2,500 – $1,400 = $1,100
$1,400 – $700 = $700
(b) |
Jan. 31 |
Loss Due to
Market Decline of Inventory.......................... |
500 |
|
|
|
Allowance to Reduce Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb. 28 |
Loss Due to
Market Decline of Inventory.......................... |
2,000 |
|
|
|
Allowance to Reduce Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31 |
Allowance to
Reduce Inventory to Market........................ |
1,100 |
|
|
|
Recovery of Loss Due to Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr. 30 |
Allowance to
Reduce Inventory to Market........................ |
700 |
|
|
|
Recovery of Loss Due to Market |
|
|
EXERCISE 9-6 VIP
Net realizable
value (ceiling) |
$45 – $14 = $31 |
|
Net realizable
value less normal profit (floor) |
$31 – $ 9 = $22 |
|
Replacement cost |
$35 |
|
Designated market |
$31 |
Ceiling |
Cost |
$40 |
|
Lower of cost or
market |
$31 |
|
$35 figure used – $31
correct value per unit = $4 per unit.
$4 X 1,000 units =
$4,000.
If ending inventory
is overstated, net income will be overstated.
If beginning
inventory is overstated, net income will be understated.
Therefore, net income for 2004 was overstated by $4,000 and
net income for 2005 was understated by $4,000.
EXERCISE 9-7
Cost
Per Lot |
$2,100 |
2,800 |
1,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$18,900 |
42,000 |
28,560 |
$89,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$89,460 |
89,460 |
89,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$27,000/$127,800 |
$60,000/$127,800 |
$40,800/$127,800 |
|
|
$80,000 |
56,000 |
24,000 |
18,200 |
$ 5,800 |
|
|
Cost |
$2,100
$
8,400 |
2,800
22,400 |
1,680
25,200 |
$56,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
27,000 |
60,000 |
40,800 |
$127,800 |
|
Sales
(see schedule) |
Cost
of goods sold (see schedule) |
Gross
profit |
Operating
expenses |
Net income |
|
|
|
$12,000 |
32,000 |
36,000 |
$80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
$3,000 |
4,000 |
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
$3,000 |
4,000 |
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
9 |
15 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
8 |
15 |
27 |
|
* 9 – 5 = 4 |
15 – 7 = 8 |
17 – 2 = 15 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Group
1 |
Group
2 |
Group
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Group
1 |
Group
2 |
Group
3 |
Total |
|
EXERCISE
9-12
(a) |
Inventory, May 1 (at cost) |
|
$160,000 |
|
Purchases (gross) (at cost) |
|
640,000 |
|
Purchase discounts |
|
(12,000) |
|
Freight-in |
|
30,000 |
|
Goods
available (at cost) |
|
818,000 |
|
Sales (at selling price) |
$1,000,000 |
|
|
Sales returns (at selling price) |
(70,000) |
|
|
Net sales (at selling price) |
930,000 |
|
|
Less gross profit (30% of $930,000) |
279,000 |
|
|
Sales
(at cost) |
|
651,000 |
|
Approximate
inventory, May 31 |
|
|
|
(at cost) |
|
$167,000 |
(a) Gross profit as a percent of sales must be computed:
|
30% |
= 23.08% of sales. |
|
100% + 30% |
|
Inventory,
May 1 (at cost) |
|
$160,000 |
|
Purchases
(gross) (at cost) |
|
640,000 |
|
Purchase
discounts |
|
(12,000) |
|
Freight-in |
|
30,000 |
|
Goods available (at cost) |
|
818,000 |
|
Sales (at
selling price) |
$1,000,000 |
|
|
Sales
returns (at selling price) |
(70,000) |
|
|
Net sales
(at selling price) |
930,000 |
|
|
Less gross
profit (23.08% of $930,000) |
214,644 |
|
|
Sales (at cost) |
|
715,356 |
|
Approximate inventory,
May 31 |
|
|
|
(at cost) |
|
$102,644 |
*EXERCISE 9-22 VIP
(a) |
Conventional Retail
Method |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Cost |
|
Retail |
|||
|
Inventory,
January 1, 2003 |
$
38,100 |
|
$
60,000 |
|||
|
Purchases (net) |
130,900 |
|
178,000 |
|||
|
|
169,000 |
|
238,000 |
|||
|
Add markups (net) |
________ |
|
22,000 |
|||
|
|
$169,000 |
|
260,000 |
|||
|
Deduct markdowns
(net) |
|
|
13,000 |
|||
|
Sales price of
goods available |
|
|
247,000 |
|||
|
Deduct sales (net) |
|
|
167,000 |
|||
|
Ending
inventory, at retail |
|
|
$
80,000 |
|||
|
Cost-to-retail
ratio = |
$169,000 |
= 65% |
|
|||
|
$260,000 |
|
|||||
Ending inventory at cost = 65% X
$80,000 = $52,000
(b) |
LIFO Retail Method |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Cost |
|
Retail |
|||
|
Inventory,
January 1, 2003 |
$
38,100 |
|
$
60,000 |
|||
|
Purchases (net) |
130,900 |
|
178,000 |
|||
|
Add markups (net) |
|
|
22,000 |
|||
|
Deduct markdowns
(net) |
|
|
(13,000) |
|||
|
Total (excluding beginning
inventory) |
130,900 |
|
187,000 |
|||
|
Total
(including beginning inventory) |
$169,000 |
|
247,000 |
|||
|
Deduct sales (net) |
|
|
167,000 |
|||
|
Ending
inventory, at retail |
|
|
$
80,000 |
|||
|
Cost-to-retail
ratio = |
$130,900 |
= 70% |
|
|||
|
$187,000 |
|
|||||
Computation of ending inventory at LIFO cost, 2004:
Ending Inventory at
Retail Prices |
|
Layers at Retail
Prices |
|
Cost to Retail
(Percentage) |
|
Ending Inventory at
LIFO Cost |
|
$80,000 |
|
2003 $60,000 |
X |
63.5%* |
|
$38,100 |
|
|
|
2004 20,000 |
X |
70.0% |
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$52,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*$38,100 |
(prior years cost to retail) |
|
|
|
|||
$60,000 |
|
|
|
||||
VIP |
PROBLEM 9-6 |
|
(a) |
|
Cost |
|
Retail |
||
|
Inventory (beginning) |
$
17,000 |
|
$
25,000 |
||
|
Purchases |
86,500 |
|
137,000 |
||
|
Freight-in |
7,000 |
|
|
||
|
Purchase allowances |
(2,200) |
|
|
||
|
Purchase returns |
(2,300) |
|
(3,000) |
||
|
Transfers-in from suburb branch |
9,200 |
|
13,000 |
||
|
|
$115,200 |
|
172,000 |
||
|
Markups (net) |
|
|
8,000 |
||
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
||
|
Markdowns (net) |
|
|
(4,000) |
||
|
Inventory losses due to breakage |
|
|
(400) |
||
|
Sales |
|
$(85,000) |
|
||
|
Sales returns |
|
2,400 |
|
||
|
Net sales |
|
|
(82,600) |
||
|
Ending inventory at retail |
|
|
$
93,000 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cost-to-retail ratio = |
$115,200 |
= 64% |
|
||
|
$180,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
(b) |
Ending inventory at
lower of average cost or market |
|
||||
|
(64% of $93,000) |
|
|
$
59,520 |
||
VIP |
PROBLEM 9-8 |
|
|
||||||
(a) |
|
Cost |
|
Retail |
|||||
|
Inventory
(beginning) |
$ 52,000 |
|
$ 78,000 |
|||||
|
Purchases |
262,000 |
|
423,000 |
|||||
|
Purchase
returns |
(5,600) |
|
(8,000) |
|||||
|
Freight-in |
16,600 |
|
_______ |
|||||
|
|
$325,000 |
|
493,000 |
|||||
|
Markups |
|
9,000 |
|
|||||
|
Markup cancellations |
|
(2,000) |
7,000 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|||||
|
Markdowns
(net) |
|
|
(3,600) |
|||||
|
Normal
spoilage and breakage |
|
|
(10,000) |
|||||
|
Sales |
|
|
(380,000) |
|||||
|
Ending
inventory at retail |
|
|
$106,400 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cost-to-retail
ratio = |
$325,000 |
= 65% |
|
|||||
|
$500,000 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Ending inventory at lower of cost or
market |
|
|||||||
|
(65% of $106,400) |
|
|
$ 69,160 |
|||||
(b) The difference between the inventory
estimate per retail method and the amount per physical count may be due to:
1.
Theft losses
(shoplifting or pilferage).
2.
Spoilage or breakage
above normal.
3.
Differences in
cost/retail ratio for purchases during the month, beginning inventory, and
ending inventory.
4.
Markups on goods
available for sale inconsistent between cost of goods sold and ending
inventory.
5.
A wide variety of
merchandise with varying cost/retail ratios.
6.
Incorrect reporting
of markdowns, additional markups, or cancellations.
VIP |
PROBLEM 9-10 |
|
(a)
Schedule A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRV— Normal Profit (Floor) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
1,100 |
|
$8.40 |
|
$9.00 |
|
$7.20 |
|
$8.40 |
|
$7.50 |
|
$7.50 |
B |
|
800 |
|
8.00 |
|
8.50 |
|
7.30 |
|
8.00 |
|
8.20 |
|
8.00 |
C |
|
1,000 |
|
5.40 |
|
6.10 |
|
5.50 |
|
5.50 |
|
5.60 |
|
5.50 |
D |
|
1,000 |
|
4.20 |
|
5.50 |
|
4.00 |
|
4.20 |
|
3.80 |
|
3.80 |
E |
|
1,400 |
|
6.30 |
|
6.10 |
|
5.10 |
|
6.10 |
|
6.40 |
|
6.10 |
Schedule B
Item |
|
Cost |
|
Lower of Cost or Market |
|
Difference |
A |
|
1,100 X $7.50 = $8,250 |
|
1,100 X $7.50 = $8,250 |
|
None |
B |
|
800 X $8.20 = $6,560 |
|
800 X $8.00 = $6,400 |
|
$160 |
C |
|
1,000 X $5.60 = $5,600 |
|
1,000 X $5.50 = $5,500 |
|
$100 |
D |
|
1,000 X $3.80 = $3,800 |
|
1,000 X $3.80 = $3,800 |
|
None |
E |
|
1,400 X $6.40 = $8,960 |
|
1,400 X $6.10 = $8,540 |
|
$420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$680 |
(b) Cost
of Goods Sold............................................................................ |
680 |
|
Inventory...................................................................................... |
|
680 |
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
Due to Market Decline of Inventory............................................ |
680 |
|
Allowance to Reduce Inventory to
Market................................... |
|
680 |
(c) To: Finn
Berg, Clerk
From: Manager
of Accounting
Date: January 14, 2004
Subject: Instructions on determining lower of
cost or market for inventory valuation
This memo responds to your
questions regarding our use of lower of cost or market for inventory valuation.
Simply put, value inventory at whichever is the lower: the actual cost or the
market value of the inventory at the time of valuation.The term cost is
relatively simple. It refers to the amount our company paid for our inventory
including costs associated with preparing the inventory for sale.
The term market, on the
other hand, is more complicated. As you have already noticed, this value could
be the inventory’s replacement cost, its net realizable value (selling price
minus any estimated costs to complete and sell), or its net realizable value
less a normal profit margin. The profession requires that the middle value of
the three above costs be chosen as the “designated market value.” This
designated market value is then compared to the actual cost in determining the
lower of cost or market.
Refer to Item A on the attached
schedule. The values for the replacement cost, net realizable value, and net
realizable value less a normal profit margin are $8.40, $9.00 ($10.50 – $1.50),
and $7.20 ($9.00 – $1.80) respectively. The middle value is the replacement
cost, $8.40, which becomes the designated market value for Item A. Compare it
with the actual cost, $7.50, choosing the lower to value Item A in inventory.
In this case, $7.50 is the value chosen to value inventory. Thus, inventory for
Item A amounts to $8,250. (See Schedule B, Item A.)
Proceed in the same way, always
choosing the middle value among replacement cost, net realizable value, and net
realizable value less a normal profit, and compare that middle value to the
actual cost. The lower of these will always be the amount at which you value
the particular item.
After you have aggregated the total lower of cost or market for all items, you
will be likely to have a loss on inventory which must be accounted for. In our
example, the loss is $680. You can journalize this loss in one of two ways:
Cost
of Goods Sold....................................................................................... |
680 |
|
Inventory............................................................................................. |
|
680 |
or |
|
|
Loss
Due to Market Decline of Inventory....................................................... |
680 |
|
Allowance to Reduce Inventory to
Market.......................................... |
|
680 |
This memo should answer your
questions about which value to choose when valuing inventory at lower of cost
or market.
Schedule A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRV—Normal
Profit (Floor) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
1,100 |
|
$8.40 |
|
$9.00 |
|
$7.20 |
|
$8.40 |
|
$7.50 |
|
$7.50 |
B |
|
800 |
|
8.00 |
|
8.50 |
|
7.30 |
|
8.00 |
|
8.20 |
|
8.00 |
C |
|
1,000 |
|
5.40 |
|
6.10 |
|
5.50 |
|
5.50 |
|
5.60 |
|
5.50 |
D |
|
1,000 |
|
4.20 |
|
5.50 |
|
4.00 |
|
4.20 |
|
3.80 |
|
3.80 |
E |
|
1,400 |
|
6.30 |
|
6.10 |
|
5.10 |
|
6.10 |
|
6.40 |
|
6.10 |
Schedule B
Item |
|
Cost |
|
Lower of
Cost or Market |
|
Difference |
A |
|
1,100 X
$7.50 = $8,250 |
|
1,100 X
$7.50 = $8,250 |
|
None |
B |
|
800 X $8.20 = $6,560 |
|
800 X $8.00 = $6,400 |
|
$160 |
C |
|
1,000 X
$5.60 = $5,600 |
|
1,000 X
$5.50 = $5,500 |
|
$100 |
D |
|
1,000 X
$3.80 = $3,800 |
|
1,000 X
$3.80 = $3,800 |
|
None |
E |
|
1,400 X
$6.40 = $8,960 |
|
1,400 X
$6.10 = $8,540 |
|
$420 |
|
*PROBLEM
9-11 |
|
(a) |
|
Cost |
|
Retail |
|||
|
Inventory,
January 1 |
$ 30,000 |
|
$ 43,000 |
|||
|
Purchases |
108,800 |
|
155,000 |
|||
|
Purchase
returns and allowances |
(2,800) |
|
(4,000) |
|||
|
Totals |
136,000 |
|
194,000 |
|||
|
Add net
markups |
|
|
|
|||
|
Markups |
|
$ 9,200 |
|
|||
|
Markup cancellations |
_______ |
(3,200) |
6,000 |
|||
|
Totals |
$136,000 |
|
200,000 |
|||
|
Deduct net
markdowns |
|
|
|
|||
|
Markdowns |
|
$ 10,500 |
|
|||
|
Markdown cancellations |
|
(6,500) |
4,000 |
|||
|
Sales price
of goods available |
|
|
196,000 |
|||
|
Sales |
|
$159,000 |
|
|||
|
Sales
returns and allowances |
|
(8,000) |
151,000 |
|||
|
Ending
inventory at retail |
|
|
$ 45,000 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cost-to-retail
ratio = |
$136,000 |
= 68% |
|
|||
|
$200,000 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Inventory at lower of cost or
market (68% X $45,000) |
$ 30,600 |
|||||
(b) |
Ending inventory at retail at January
1 price level |
|
|||||
|
Less beginning inventory at retail |
43,000 |
|||||
|
Inventory increment at retail,
January 1 price level |
$ 7,000 |
|||||
|
Inventory increment at retail,
June 30 price level |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
Beginning inventory at cost |
$ 30,000 |
|||||
|
Inventory increment at cost at June
30 price level |
|
|||||
|
Ending inventory at
dollar-value LIFO cost |
$ 35,292 |
|||||